Pros And Cons Of Composable Architecture Vs. Traditional Storage
SearchStorage, June 24th, 2020
June 24, 2020,
Volume 267, Issue 4

If traditional storage isn't meeting your organization's needs, composable infrastructure may be the answer. Get to know the pros and cons of both approaches

"Traditional storage architectures such as NAS or SAN have supported a range of workloads over the years, and they continue to do so. However, massive growth of increasingly diverse data, coupled with modern application technologies and workflow complexities, have stretched these architectures to their limit.

To address today's storage needs, many IT teams are deploying storage based on composable architecture, abstracting storage and other physical resources and delivering them as services. But before organizations go this route, they should understand the pros and cons of traditional storage vs. composable infrastructure..."

Read More ...


Other articles in the IT - Storage section of Volume 267, Issue 4:

See all archived articles in the IT - Storage section.